DEPROGRAMMING DISSECTION PART 2: A Vaccinated Person Will Have Less Severe Symptoms, Won’t Be Hospitalized or Die from Covid
Follow-Up Analysis Using Science to Prove their Science Isn’t Actually Science
I promised to do a follow-up to a previous post (click here) where I applied the scientific method to debunk the claim that “a vaccinated person will have less severe symptoms and won’t be hospitalized or die from Covid.”
As previously stated, the claim might be true, or it might be false.
And, in the world of actual science, we know definitively that claims of “might of” are not science, but rather opinions or untested hypotheses that cannot be proven or disproven.
What you have been told is science, is actually pseudoscience. It’s propaganda.
Image taken from Science vs Pseudoscience by Dr. Simon (click here)
This is “misinformation” you’ve been intentionally gaslit into believing.
By design.
On purpose.
***I apologize for the cognitive dissonance. But, it’s time to open your eyes and lean into the discomfort of reality.***
To recap, I analyzed the claim through 3 filters: 1) the Parameters, 2) the Research Design and 3) the Special Interests of the researchers.
My expert analysis is that such a claim is statistically impossible to measure.
I welcome anyone to challenge my analysis of this claim. And, if you are to do so, I expect you to provide the following:
The variables included in a study
The hypotheses tested by the study
The extraneous variables included in the study
The total sample size of the study
A complete breakdown of the characteristics of the study participants by age, gender, weight and relevant medical history
A detailed explanation of how the variables were measured
The research design deployed to measure the variables
The analyses performed to produce study results
The raw data, uncut
How the integrity of the data was preserved
How the extraneous variables were controlled for in the study
How outliers were handled
Who collected the data
Who funded the research
Detailed breakdown of potential conflicts of interests between those who funded the research and the results of the data
Disclosure of any financial incentives tied to the study’s findings
And once this information is provided, I will prescribe my same BS Detector approach to analyze your challenge. I am not saying I am 100% correct, but you will have quite a bit of convincing to do to get my PhD brain to see the claim in question as ethical and grounded in the scientific method.
And no, saying you “heard it on CNN” is not a valid challenge.
RULE OF THUMB:
Unless you personally have reviewed the above information or at minimum reviewed a third party’s analysis of a study, you should never blindly believe “the science.” And to be clear, third-party analyses need to be conducted by people who have zero financial incentive connected to the study’s results.
Since I’ve concluded the claim that “a vaccinated person will have less severe symptoms and won’t be hospitalized or die from Covid” is debunked, let’s move on to do a Deprogramming Dissection of the claim.
DEPROGRAMMING DISSECTION
When you apply my Deprogramming Dissection approach to whatever it is you need to analyze, here are a few tips to consider:
You don’t have to go through the steps in sequential order. What matters most is you put your own thinking into the dissection.
This is merely a tool for you to use to encourage critical thinking and challenge your beliefs. Tailor the approach in a way that that makes most sense for how you think.
Practice, practice, practice
Find others to discuss your insights and analyses with to help you hone this skill
Let’s Begin
The Message
When thinking about the Message communicated by those who wish to deceive you, it requires you to hone your skill of deciphering between what “they say” and what “they mean” by a message.
And, when they say that “a vaccinated person will have less severe symptoms and won’t be hospitalized or die from Covid” there are many possibilities around what “they mean”. Here are a few possible interpretations to get you started:
We need you to think there is a benefit to being vaccinated, so we’ve made this up to give you that false sense of security
We know we can’t measure this, but we don’t think you will figure that out
We need you divided with the unvaccinated, so we need to make you believe you are better than them
We don’t want you to figure out that you have been duped into taking something that doesn’t work
REFLECTION: What other possible explanations can you identify relating to what “they mean” by continuing to circulate this false claim repeated in the media?
Decipher What You Are Programmed to Think, Feel, Say and Do
This next step will help you uncover the intended result of psychological manipulation. Here are my initial interpretations based on what I have observed in the people who believe this claim:
REFLECTION: What other observations have you had relating to what people typically Think, Feel, Say and Do relating to this claim being dissected?
The Psychological Manipulation Tactics Deployed
Gaslighting and Deflection, in my opinion, are the two main tactics being deployed when the false claim that “a vaccinated person will have less severe symptoms and won’t be hospitalized or die from Covid” is spread by those who benefit from your blind belief in the claim.
They can’t exactly have people questioning why everyone seems to be catching Covid, independent of vaccination status, now can they? No.
And to achieve their larger more nefarious objectives (described shortly in the Why), they need to ensure the following to keep this narrative alive:
They need the vaccinated, their loyal servants, subdued and compliant
They need everyone divided by vaccination status (remember, division is their greatest weapon)
They need the vaccinated people to project their anger and frustration on the unvaccinated, rather than the source of their actual problem
They need to distract the vaccinated people from the fact that they sold them a faulty bill of goods
Therefore, in order to deflect from their failures they gaslight people into believing an alternative reality that will keep their customers loyal and the division maxed out.
Their narrative goes a little something like this:
They tell you that the vaccines were never intended to make you immune, even though that is exactly what you were told originally.
Then they gaslight you into pretending that never said that. Take a look at this video that compiles all the news stories into one – turn up the volume for full effect (click here).
Then they change definitions to suit their needs. For example, they changed the definition of a “vaccine” to support their ever changing narrative by removing the word “immunity.” Much like how they changed the definition of “gain of function” to detract from the fact that Covid was a bioweapon made in a lab by the very people who have been put front and center as your “trusted experts.”
Who owns USA Today?
Then they tell you that there are no severe side effects from the vaccines.
If by chance you do experience a severe side effect or know someone who dies, then they will censor you for spreading “misinformation.” Read the story of Jessica Berg Wilson here and how her obituary was labeled “misinformation” on Twitter (click here)
Then as those who see their agenda get louder in poking holes in their narrative and they start to get the attention of those they wish to remain subdued and compliant, they bring out of their defamatory labels. Their starter / “go-to” label is “misinformation” And when that doesn’t work, they pull out their favorite gaslighting tool of all, the “Race Card.” Just look at what they have done to Joe Rogan.
They can’t help themselves.
Their Crimes Against Humanity are so despicable, they will keep up this charade until the masses wake up to their tactics.
So, please wake up.
SIDEBAR: Here is the latest VAERS data as of 2/4/2022.
There are 23,149 reported and confirmed deaths by the Covid-19 vaccines as of 2/4/2022.
“The total number of deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccines is more than double the number of deaths associated with all other vaccines combined since the year 1990.”
1%
So, if we have 23,149 confirmed deaths, that would imply the actual number of deaths is closer to 2,314,900. I’ve also read sources that suggest the number of deaths only represent 2 – 4% of the actual number. This would still give us a death rate between 578,725 and 1,157,450.
Does this not concern you?
Why are they silent on these results?
Why do they keep pushing the vaccines?
Also, here is the fact check of the VAERS data by Reuters (click here).
Who owns Reuters?
Amazing how the fact checkers NEVER agree with anything incriminating to those who financially benefit from your getting the vaccines.
I wonder why?
The gaslighting to deceive the people and to deflect from what they are doing is beyond words for me.
How can this even be possible?
They lie. All the time.
And whenever they lie, what is originally labeled as “conspiracy theory” eventually is proven to be true. I think we’re running about a 3 - 6 months turnover time at this point.
It’s just a matter of time.
And rather than ever taking accountability, they just change their narrative and the gaslighting continues.
And because people are blind to their tactics, they just keep going along with the lie.
It’s fascinating and quite brilliant.
Too bad it’s also completely evil.
The Why
To keep this post from turning into a novel, I will try to keep this short.
Think of the movie the Godfather.
When you have organized crime, what do these criminals do to keep their façade alive and themselves in power?
They bribe, threaten, honeypot, slander, and silence (literally and figuratively), misdirect, gaslight, and deflect to get the people to comply, turn a blind eye and even in some cases become unwilling foot soldiers to their cause.
They offer protection from harm, but if you don’t comply (e.g., pay your rent / take the vax), they hurt you.
Does this sound familiar?
If you try to go against the mob, at first, you’ll be met with a small warning.
And if the warning doesn’t work, the fear tactics escalate (think being labeled as “misinformation” to then being censored to now being threated by DHS for speaking against the approved narrative).
This is our world now.
Your refusal to see what is right in front of you has turned you into an unwilling foot soldier, whether you see it or not.
It’s your job now, to do thorough research to identify the Boss, the Underbosses, the Consiglieri, the Capo Regimes, the Soldiers, and the Associates.
I recommend you start with the people the Mockingbird Media tells you to trust most.
Also, please get yourself a copy of The Real Anthony Fauci by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. It’s heartbreaking and infuriating to see the damage Lord Mengele has done to humanity. And sadly, people need to understand the reason we’re now suddenly seeing stories about HIV popping up in the news is not coincidence (more on this at a later date). That too is connected.
You have to take the time to learn and wake up to the truth no matter how painful it is.
So, as this relates to our claim of the day, “a vaccinated person will have less severe symptoms and won’t be hospitalized or die from Covid,” they have no choice but to keep this narrative going or they know their goose is cooked.
That is their Why. They have to keep going. They have no other choice.
It’s really that simple.
In summary, I know I mentioned I would discuss Psyops, but this is getting too long, so I will table that for another day.
And, I want to end with this:
Ironically, as of 2/7/2022, spreading “misinformation” will earn an American the title of Domestic Terrorist as per our own government.
And the very people who have made accusations towards others about spreading “misinformation” are the ones most guilty in doing what they have projected onto others.
I welcome you to review Steve Kirsch’s Newsletter to the DHS with the list of top COVID misinformation spreaders that should be investigated ASAP (click here).
I agree with his assessment completely.
I wonder what the DHS will do with all the people who have used the accusation of “misinformation” as a weapon to silence those who spoke truth.
And I wonder if every person who has been censored and silenced for being wrongfully accused as spreading “misinformation” will have their voices back once they are proven to have been correct.
I wonder.
I already know the answer.
As should you if you’ve been paying attention.